About Us
Membership
Scientific Meeting
Awards
News
Education
Careers
Links
Canadian Society for Immunology
Members Please login here
Click here to become a member of CSI today
CSI 2012 Meeting
 
Registration
Meeting Deadlines
Meeting Details
Meeting Activities
Meeting Hotel
Meeting Program
Meeting Sponsors
Abstract/Poster
Travel Awards
Meeting Travel
Credits
CSI @ AAI
Abstract/Poster
Information on Abstracts

Deadline: April 27, 2012

Submission: When you register for the conference there is a space provided to attach your abstract as a Word format  file or a Rich Text Format (RTF) file.

Format:

  • Text in Microsoft Word (PC), or Rich Text Format (RTF) (if it includes figures or tables).

  • Title in CAPITAL letters and in BOLD.

  • First name, initial (if used) and last name of all authors, with presenting author's name underlined, followed by their affiliation(s).

  • Body of abstract containing aim of study, methodology, results and conclusion(s).

  • Acknowledgment of support in italics.

  • All text in a 12 point font (e.g. Arial or Times), single space.

  • Maximum all-inclusive size of abstract: 14 x 14 cm (approx. 28 lines, 280 words or 1900 characters and spaces).

View your conference registration here if you wish to edit or reload a revised abstract with your registration. This option will only be available until April 27/12.


Click
here for an example (PDF).

Notes for the preparation of Posters

The dimensions of the poster should not exceed 3' 5" (w) by 4' (h). Push pins will be provided.

 

Criteria for Poster Judging

Below are the criteria that will be used in the poster judging competition:

  • Student presenters will have a maximum of 10 minutes with the judges  during which time they should give a concise presentation of their work to the judge or judges (3-4 minutes maximum) which will be followed by 6-7 minutes of questions about the work.

  • In round one, each poster will be viewed by only one judge, randomly selected, but not from their institute. Each judge views 5 posters.

  • Judges confer and select one of the viewed posters for round 2. In case a judge can't decide, a second judge may be sent to view two closely ranked posters.

  • Students need to be available in case they are selected for round 2 (Posters will be identified soon after the end of round one with post it notes).

  • During round 2, posters selected in round 1 will be viewed twice, by two pairs of judges, again for 10 minutes each as outlined above and given a score. Prizes will be awarded based on overall score from the 4 judges in round 2.

  • In some cases, judges will again need to go back to posters to re-evaluate two closely ranked posters. Therefore, students are asked to keep close to their posters for the duration of the judging process and may be asked to present 3 or even 4 times.

  • Posters are judged on scientific excellence, ability of student to present and answer questions, scope of research, taking into consideration the length of time in the program and the proportion of research contributed directly by the student.

 

About Us Membership Scientific Meeting Awards News Education Careers Links